Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Xiaomi

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

115 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

New

Stop Googling APIs — let your agent choose

Our upcoming API Finder MCP server helps AI agents discover and compare APIs for any task.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Speed
MiMo v2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideofile
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper input pricing at $1.00/M tokens. MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper output pricing at $3.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools's score of N/A.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.