Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiniMax M2.7
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleMinimax
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2026

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Modalities

Input
audiofileimagetextvideo
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's score of N/A.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview supports vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.