Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 3 270M Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Gemma 3 270M Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Gemma 3 270M Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Context Window
Gemma 2 27B
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 27BGemma 3 270M Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 27BGemma 3 270M Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedJul 2024Unknown

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Gemma 3 270M Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Compare Gemma 3 270M Instruct with:

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 3 270M Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. Gemma 3 270M Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Gemma 3 270M Instruct's score of N/A.
Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window, while Gemma 3 270M Instruct has a unknown token context window.
Gemma 2 27B supports vision. Gemma 3 270M Instruct does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.