Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 3 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Gemma 3 27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Gemma 3 27B
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 3 27B
Context Window
Gemma 3 27B
Speed
Gemma 3 27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 27BGemma 3 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 27BGemma 3 27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedJul 2024Mar 2025

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Gemma 3 27B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Compare Gemma 3 27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 3 27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.08/M tokens. Gemma 3 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.16/M tokens.
Gemma 3 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 9.6, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window, while Gemma 3 27B has a 128,000 token context window.
Gemma 2 27B supports vision. Gemma 3 27B supports vision.