Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemma 2 27B vs MedGemma 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MedGemma 27B wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Context Window
MedGemma 27B
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 27BMedGemma 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 27BMedGemma 27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedJul 2024Unknown

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MedGemma 27B Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 2 27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.65/M tokens. Gemma 2 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.65/M tokens.
Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window, while MedGemma 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemma 2 27B supports vision. MedGemma 27B does not support vision.