Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemma 2 27BLlama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.65$0.10 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.65$0.32 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.13 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 76% cheaper overall.

Gemma 2 27B Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
1
Gemma 2 27B Wins
3
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BLlama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
36.214.5
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-10.7-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-7.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
38.471.3
GPQA
Graduate-level science
16.749.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-28.8-
Aider
Real-world code editing
36.159.4
AIME
Competition math
-30.0-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
49.3--
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemma 2 27B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemma 2 27B
8,192
tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 94% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemma 2 27BLlama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Tokens/secondN/A99.5 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.54s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 27BLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 27BLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMeta-llama
ReleasedJul 2024Dec 2024

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Compare Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.32/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.7, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Gemma 2 27B supports vision. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision.