Key Takeaways
Gemma 2 27B wins:
- Higher intelligence benchmark
- Supports vision
Mistral Nemo wins:
- Cheaper input tokens
- Cheaper output tokens
- Larger context window
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
N/A
Pricing Comparison
Price Comparison
| Metric | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Nemo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.65 | $0.02 | Mistral Nemo |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $0.65 | $0.04 | Mistral Nemo |
| Cache Read (per 1M) | N/A | $0.01 | Mistral Nemo |
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral Nemo is 96% cheaper overall.
Gemma 2 27B Providers
No provider data available
Mistral Nemo Providers
No provider data available
Benchmark Comparison
5
Benchmarks Compared
4
Gemma 2 27B Wins
0
Mistral Nemo Wins
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Nemo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Overall intelligence score | 36.2 | 25.0 | |
MMLU Pro Academic knowledge | 38.4 | 26.4 | |
GPQA Graduate-level science | 16.7 | 8.7 | |
Aider Real-world code editing | 36.1 | - | - |
BBH Big-Bench Hard | 49.3 | 36.1 |
Gemma 2 27B wins 4 out of 5 benchmarks.
Cost vs Quality
X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemma 2 27B
Other models
Context & Performance
Context Window
Gemma 2 27B
8,192
tokens
Mistral Nemo
131,072
tokens
Mistral Nemo has a 94% larger context window.
Speed Performance
Speed benchmarks not available for these models
Capabilities
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Tool/Function Calls | ||
| Reasoning Mode | ||
| Audio Input | ||
| Audio Output | ||
| PDF Input | ||
| Prompt Caching | ||
| Web Search |
License & Release
| Property | Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| License | Open Source | Open Source |
| Author | Mistral AI | |
| Released | Jul 2024 | Jul 2024 |
Gemma 2 27B Modalities
Input
text
Output
text
Mistral Nemo Modalities
Input
text
Output
text