Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

Gemma 2 27B vs Kimi K2 Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2 Thinking
Context Window
Kimi K2 Thinking
Speed
Kimi K2 Thinking

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemma 2 27BKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.65$0.40 Kimi K2 Thinking
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.65$1.75 Gemma 2 27B
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$200000.00 Kimi K2 Thinking
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemma 2 27B is 12% cheaper overall.

Gemma 2 27B Providers

NextBit $0.65 (Cheapest)

Kimi K2 Thinking Providers

Chutes $0.40 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.47
Parasail $0.50
SiliconFlow $0.55
AtlasCloud $0.60

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemma 2 27B Wins
3
Kimi K2 Thinking Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
36.240.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-34.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-94.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
38.484.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
16.783.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-85.3-
Aider
Real-world code editing
36.1--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
49.3--
Kimi K2 Thinking significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemma 2 27B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemma 2 27B
8,192
tokens
Max output: 2,048 tokens
Kimi K2 Thinking
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
Kimi K2 Thinking has a 97% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemma 2 27BKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Tokens/secondN/A82.1 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.64s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 27BKimi K2 Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 27BKimi K2 Thinking
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorGoogleMoonshotai
ReleasedJul 2024Nov 2025

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2 Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Compare Kimi K2 Thinking with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2 Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Gemma 2 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.65/M tokens.
Kimi K2 Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 34.8, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window, while Kimi K2 Thinking has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemma 2 27B does not support vision. Kimi K2 Thinking does not support vision.