Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Context Window
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 27BLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 27BLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleNvidia
ReleasedJul 2024Unknown

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.60/M tokens. Gemma 2 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.65/M tokens.
Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a 128,000 token context window.
Gemma 2 27B supports vision. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 does not support vision.