Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Context Window
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemma 2 27BLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.65$0.10 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.65$0.40 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is 73% cheaper overall.

Gemma 2 27B Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
1
Gemma 2 27B Wins
2
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
36.214.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-10.5-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-8.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
38.469.2
GPQA
Graduate-level science
16.748.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-29.0-
Aider
Real-world code editing
36.1--
AIME
Competition math
-13.7-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
49.3--
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemma 2 27B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemma 2 27B
8,192
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 94% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemma 2 27BLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Tokens/secondN/A82.7 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.24s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 27BLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 27BLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorGoogleNvidia
ReleasedJul 2024Oct 2025

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.5, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
Gemma 2 27B supports vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.