Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Xiaomi

Gemma 2 27B vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
MiMo v2 Omni

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 27BMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 27BMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorGoogleXiaomi
ReleasedJul 2024Mar 2026

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Compare MiMo v2 Omni with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Gemma 2 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.65/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemma 2 27B supports vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.