Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Liquid
Liquid

Gemma 2 9B vs LFM2-24B-A2B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

115 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

New

Stop Googling APIs — let your agent choose

Our upcoming API Finder MCP server helps AI agents discover and compare APIs for any task.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 9B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

LFM2-24B-A2B wins:

  • Larger context window
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 9B
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 2 9B
Context Window
LFM2-24B-A2B
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 9BLFM2-24B-A2B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 9BLFM2-24B-A2B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleLiquid
ReleasedJun 2024Feb 2026

Gemma 2 9B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

LFM2-24B-A2B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 2 9B with:

Compare LFM2-24B-A2B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 2 9B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Gemma 2 9B has cheaper output pricing at $0.08/M tokens.
Gemma 2 9B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to LFM2-24B-A2B's score of N/A.
Gemma 2 9B has a 8,192 token context window, while LFM2-24B-A2B has a 32,768 token context window.
Gemma 2 9B supports vision. LFM2-24B-A2B does not support vision.