Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Gemma 2 9B vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 9B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemma 2 9BLlama 3.1 8B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.03$0.02 Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.09$0.05 Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 39% cheaper overall.

Gemma 2 9B Providers

Nebius $0.03 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.08

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Providers

Nebius $0.02 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.02 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.02 (Cheapest)
Groq $0.05
SiliconFlow $0.06

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
1
Gemma 2 9B Wins
2
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemma 2 9BLlama 3.1 8B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
32.111.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-4.9-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-4.3-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
31.947.6
GPQA
Graduate-level science
14.825.9
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-11.6-
Aider
Real-world code editing
-37.6-
AIME
Competition math
-7.7-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
42.1--
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins 2 out of 9 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemma 2 9B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemma 2 9B
8,192
tokens
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
16,384
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemma 2 9BLlama 3.1 8B InstructWinner
Tokens/secondN/A162.2 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.33s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 9BLlama 3.1 8B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 9BLlama 3.1 8B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMeta-llama
ReleasedJun 2024Jul 2024

Gemma 2 9B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 2 9B with:

Compare Llama 3.1 8B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 4.9, compared to Gemma 2 9B's score of N/A.
Gemma 2 9B has a 8,192 token context window, while Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a 16,384 token context window.
Gemma 2 9B does not support vision. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct does not support vision.