Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Gemma 2 9B vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 9B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Mistral Small 3.1 24B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 9B
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Context Window
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Speed
Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemma 2 9BMistral Small 3.1 24BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.03$0.03Tie
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.09$0.11 Gemma 2 9B
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$15000.00 Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemma 2 9B is 10% cheaper overall.

Gemma 2 9B Providers

Nebius $0.03 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.08

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Providers

Chutes $0.03 (Cheapest)
Cloudflare $0.35

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
1
Gemma 2 9B Wins
2
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMistral Small 3.1 24BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
32.114.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-13.9-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-3.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
31.965.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
14.845.4
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-21.2-
AIME
Competition math
-9.3-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
42.1--
Mistral Small 3.1 24B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemma 2 9B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemma 2 9B
8,192
tokens
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
131,072
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
Mistral Small 3.1 24B has a 94% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemma 2 9BMistral Small 3.1 24BWinner
Tokens/secondN/A104.2 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.29s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 9BMistral Small 3.1 24B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 9BMistral Small 3.1 24B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMistral AI
ReleasedJun 2024Mar 2025

Gemma 2 9B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 2 9B with:

Compare Mistral Small 3.1 24B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 2 9B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Gemma 2 9B has cheaper output pricing at $0.09/M tokens.
Mistral Small 3.1 24B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 13.9, compared to Gemma 2 9B's score of N/A.
Gemma 2 9B has a 8,192 token context window, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B has a 131,072 token context window.
Gemma 2 9B does not support vision. Mistral Small 3.1 24B supports vision.