Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Gemma 2 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

116 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 9B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 9B
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Context Window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Speed
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 9BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 9BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleNvidia
ReleasedJun 2024Dec 2025

Gemma 2 9B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 2 9B with:

Compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 2 9B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Gemma 2 9B has cheaper output pricing at $0.08/M tokens.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.8, compared to Gemma 2 9B's score of N/A.
Gemma 2 9B has a 8,192 token context window, while Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemma 2 9B supports vision. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does not support vision.