Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Gemma 2 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

101 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 9B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 9B
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Context Window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Speed
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemma 2 9BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.03$0.05 Gemma 2 9B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.09$0.20 Gemma 2 9B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemma 2 9B is 49% cheaper overall.

Gemma 2 9B Providers

Nebius $0.03 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.08

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Providers

DeepInfra $0.05 (Cheapest)
Chutes $0.06

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
1
Gemma 2 9B Wins
2
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemma 2 9BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
32.113.3
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-15.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-13.3-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
31.957.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
14.839.9
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-36.0-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
42.1--
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemma 2 9B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemma 2 9B
8,192
tokens
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
262,144
tokens
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a 97% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemma 2 9BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWinner
Tokens/secondN/A178.1 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.25s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 9BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 9BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleNvidia
ReleasedJun 2024Dec 2025

Gemma 2 9B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 2 9B with:

Compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 2 9B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Gemma 2 9B has cheaper output pricing at $0.09/M tokens.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.8, compared to Gemma 2 9B's score of N/A.
Gemma 2 9B has a 8,192 token context window, while Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemma 2 9B does not support vision. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does not support vision.