Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemma 2 9B vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 9B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 9B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 9BGPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 9BGPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedJun 2024Feb 2026

Gemma 2 9B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 2 9B with:

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 2 9B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Gemma 2 9B has cheaper output pricing at $0.08/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Gemma 2 9B's score of N/A.
Gemma 2 9B has a 8,192 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Gemma 2 9B supports vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.