Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
S
Stepfun-ai

Gemma 2B vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Gemma 2B
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Step 3.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2BStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2BStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleStepfun-ai
ReleasedUnknownJan 2026

Gemma 2B Modalities

Input
Output

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 2B has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemma 2B has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Gemma 2B has a 8,192 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
Gemma 2B does not support vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.