Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Gemma 3 27B vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3 27B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 3 27B
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Gemma 3 27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3 27BMistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3 27BMistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMistral AI
ReleasedMar 2025Jul 2024

Gemma 3 27B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Gemma 3 27B has a 128,000 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Gemma 3 27B supports vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.