Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Gemma 3 27B vs Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3 27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemma 3 27B
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Context Window
Gemma 3 27B
Speed
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3 27BNemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3 27BNemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorGoogleNvidia
ReleasedMar 2025Unknown

Gemma 3 27B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 3 27B with:

Compare Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 3 27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.08/M tokens. Gemma 3 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.16/M tokens.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.2, compared to Gemma 3 27B's score of 9.6.
Gemma 3 27B has a 128,000 token context window, while Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has a unknown token context window.
Gemma 3 27B supports vision. Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B does not support vision.