Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-5 Nano

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3 27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5 Nano wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Gemma 3 27B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5 Nano
Context Window
GPT-5 Nano
Speed
GPT-5 Nano

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemma 3 27BGPT-5 NanoWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.04$0.05 Gemma 3 27B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.40 Gemma 3 27B
Cache Read (per 1M)$20000.00$5000.00 GPT-5 Nano
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemma 3 27B is 51% cheaper overall.

Gemma 3 27B Providers

Chutes $0.04 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.08
DeepInfra $0.08
Nebius $0.10
Phala $0.11

GPT-5 Nano Providers

OpenAI $0.05 (Cheapest)
Azure $0.05 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemma 3 27B Wins
6
GPT-5 Nano Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGPT-5 NanoWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
10.226.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
9.620.3
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
20.783.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
66.978.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
42.867.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
13.778.9
Aider
Real-world code editing
4.9--
AIME
Competition math
25.3--
GPT-5 Nano significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemma 3 27B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemma 3 27B
128,000
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
GPT-5 Nano
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5 Nano has a 68% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemma 3 27BGPT-5 NanoWinner
Tokens/second34.7 tok/s141.5 tok/s
Time to First Token2.03s110.10s
GPT-5 Nano responds 308% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3 27BGPT-5 Nano
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3 27BGPT-5 Nano
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedMar 2025Aug 2025

Gemma 3 27B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GPT-5 Nano Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 3 27B with:

Compare GPT-5 Nano with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 3 27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Gemma 3 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.15/M tokens.
GPT-5 Nano scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 20.3, compared to Gemma 3 27B's score of 9.6.
Gemma 3 27B has a 128,000 token context window, while GPT-5 Nano has a 400,000 token context window.
Gemma 3 27B supports vision. GPT-5 Nano supports vision.