Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-OSS-120b

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3 27B wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics

GPT-OSS-120b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Context Window
GPT-OSS-120b
Speed
GPT-OSS-120b

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3 27BGPT-OSS-120b
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3 27BGPT-OSS-120b
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedMar 2025Aug 2025

Gemma 3 27B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GPT-OSS-120b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 3 27B with:

Compare GPT-OSS-120b with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
GPT-OSS-120b scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.5, compared to Gemma 3 27B's score of 9.6.
Gemma 3 27B has a 128,000 token context window, while GPT-OSS-120b has a 131,072 token context window.
Gemma 3 27B supports vision. GPT-OSS-120b supports vision.