Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Gemma 3 4B vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3 4B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemma 3 4B
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Context Window
Gemma 3 4B
Speed
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemma 3 4BLlama 3.1 8B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.02$0.02 Gemma 3 4B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.07$0.05 Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 8% cheaper overall.

Gemma 3 4B Providers

Chutes $0.02 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.04

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Providers

Nebius $0.02 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.02 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.02 (Cheapest)
Groq $0.05
SiliconFlow $0.06

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
2
Gemma 3 4B Wins
4
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemma 3 4BLlama 3.1 8B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
6.311.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
2.94.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
12.74.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
41.747.6
GPQA
Graduate-level science
29.125.9
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
11.211.6-
Aider
Real-world code editing
-37.6-
AIME
Competition math
6.37.7
Gemma 3 4B shows stronger mathematical reasoning abilities.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemma 3 4B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemma 3 4B
96,000
tokens
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
16,384
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Gemma 3 4B has a 83% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemma 3 4BLlama 3.1 8B InstructWinner
Tokens/second34.9 tok/s162.2 tok/s
Time to First Token0.96s0.33s
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct responds 365% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3 4BLlama 3.1 8B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3 4BLlama 3.1 8B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMeta-llama
ReleasedMar 2025Jul 2024

Gemma 3 4B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 3 4B with:

Compare Llama 3.1 8B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 3 4B has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 4.9, compared to Gemma 3 4B's score of 2.9.
Gemma 3 4B has a 96,000 token context window, while Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a 16,384 token context window.
Gemma 3 4B supports vision. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct does not support vision.