Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Gemma 3 4B vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3 4B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Context Window
Gemma 3 4B
Speed
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3 4BLlama 3.1 8B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3 4BLlama 3.1 8B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMeta-llama
ReleasedMar 2025Jul 2024

Gemma 3 4B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 4.9, compared to Gemma 3 4B's score of 2.9.
Gemma 3 4B has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a 16,384 token context window.
Gemma 3 4B supports vision. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct does not support vision.