Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Gemma 3 4B vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3 4B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 3 4B
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Gemma 3 4B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3 4BMistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3 4BMistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMistral AI
ReleasedMar 2025Jul 2024

Gemma 3 4B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 3 4B with:

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 2.9, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Gemma 3 4B has a 131,072 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Gemma 3 4B supports vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.