Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Nousresearch
Nousresearch

Gemma 3 4B vs DeepHermes 3 Mistral 24B Preview

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute— We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3 4B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

DeepHermes 3 Mistral 24B Preview wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Gemma 3 4B
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 3 4B
Context Window
Gemma 3 4B
Speed
Gemma 3 4B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3 4BDeepHermes 3 Mistral 24B Preview
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3 4BDeepHermes 3 Mistral 24B Preview
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleNousresearch
ReleasedMar 2025Unknown

Gemma 3 4B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

DeepHermes 3 Mistral 24B Preview Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 3 4B with:

Compare DeepHermes 3 Mistral 24B Preview with:

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepHermes 3 Mistral 24B Preview has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Gemma 3 4B has cheaper output pricing at $0.08/M tokens.
Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 2.9, compared to DeepHermes 3 Mistral 24B Preview's score of N/A.
Gemma 3 4B has a 131,072 token context window, while DeepHermes 3 Mistral 24B Preview has a 32,768 token context window.
Gemma 3 4B supports vision. DeepHermes 3 Mistral 24B Preview does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.