Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
S1
Sao10k

Gemma 3 4B vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute— We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3 4B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Llama 3 8B Lunaris wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 3 4B
Context Window
Gemma 3 4B
Speed
Gemma 3 4B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3 4BLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3 4BLlama 3 8B Lunaris
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleSao10k
ReleasedMar 2025Aug 2024

Gemma 3 4B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 3 4B with:

Compare Llama 3 8B Lunaris with:

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 3 4B has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Llama 3 8B Lunaris has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 2.9, compared to Llama 3 8B Lunaris's score of N/A.
Gemma 3 4B has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 3 8B Lunaris has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemma 3 4B supports vision. Llama 3 8B Lunaris does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.