Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Liquid
Liquid

Gemma 3n 4B vs LiquidAI/LFM2-8B-A1B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3n 4B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding

LiquidAI/LFM2-8B-A1B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
LiquidAI/LFM2-8B-A1B
Benchmark Advantage
LiquidAI/LFM2-8B-A1B
Context Window
LiquidAI/LFM2-8B-A1B
Speed
Gemma 3n 4B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3n 4BLiquidAI/LFM2-8B-A1B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3n 4BLiquidAI/LFM2-8B-A1B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleLiquid
ReleasedMay 2025Oct 2025

Gemma 3n 4B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

LiquidAI/LFM2-8B-A1B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

LiquidAI/LFM2-8B-A1B has cheaper input pricing at $0.01/M tokens. LiquidAI/LFM2-8B-A1B has cheaper output pricing at $0.02/M tokens.
Gemma 3n 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 4.2, compared to LiquidAI/LFM2-8B-A1B's score of 2.3.
Gemma 3n 4B has a 32,768 token context window, while LiquidAI/LFM2-8B-A1B has a 32,768 token context window.
Gemma 3n 4B does not support vision. LiquidAI/LFM2-8B-A1B does not support vision.