Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Gemma 3n 4B vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3n 4B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Gemma 3n 4B
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 3n 4B
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Gemma 3n 4B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3n 4BMistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3n 4BMistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMistral AI
ReleasedMay 2025Jul 2024

Gemma 3n 4B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 3n 4B with:

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 3n 4B has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Gemma 3n 4B has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Gemma 3n 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 4.2, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Gemma 3n 4B has a 32,768 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Gemma 3n 4B does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.