Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Sao10k

Gemma 3n 4B vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3n 4B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Llama 3 8B Lunaris wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Gemma 3n 4B
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 3n 4B
Context Window
Gemma 3n 4B
Speed
Gemma 3n 4B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3n 4BLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3n 4BLlama 3 8B Lunaris
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleSao10k
ReleasedMay 2025Aug 2024

Gemma 3n 4B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 3n 4B has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Gemma 3n 4B has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Gemma 3n 4B has a 32,768 token context window, while Llama 3 8B Lunaris has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemma 3n 4B does not support vision. Llama 3 8B Lunaris does not support vision.