Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Xiaomi

Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 26B A4B InstructMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 4 26B A4B InstructMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleXiaomi
ReleasedApr 2026Unknown

Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.13/M tokens. Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct's score of 22.4.