Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Gemma 4 31B Instruct vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 31B InstructLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 4 31B InstructLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMeta-llama
ReleasedApr 2026Dec 2024

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 4 31B Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.32/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.7, compared to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's score of 10.7.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision.