Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Gemma 4 31B Instruct vs Llama 4 Maverick

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
Llama 4 Maverick

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 31B InstructLlama 4 Maverick
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 4 31B InstructLlama 4 Maverick
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMeta-llama
ReleasedApr 2026Apr 2025

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.14/M tokens. Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.7, compared to Llama 4 Maverick's score of 15.6.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window, while Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision. Llama 4 Maverick supports vision.