Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Gemma 4 31B Instruct vs Devstral 2 2512

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Devstral 2 2512 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Devstral 2 2512
Speed
Devstral 2 2512

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 31B InstructDevstral 2 2512
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 4 31B InstructDevstral 2 2512
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMistral AI
ReleasedApr 2026Dec 2025

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Devstral 2 2512 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.14/M tokens. Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.7, compared to Devstral 2 2512's score of 23.7.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window, while Devstral 2 2512 has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision. Devstral 2 2512 does not support vision.