Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Gemma 4 31B Instruct vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Speed
Gemma 4 31B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 31B InstructMistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 4 31B InstructMistral Nemo
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMistral AI
ReleasedApr 2026Jul 2024

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.