Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

Gemma 4 31B Instruct vs Kimi K2 0711

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Kimi K2 0711 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Speed
Kimi K2 0711

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 31B InstructKimi K2 0711
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 4 31B InstructKimi K2 0711
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMoonshotai
ReleasedApr 2026Jul 2025

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Kimi K2 0711 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.14/M tokens. Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.7, compared to Kimi K2 0711's score of 22.1.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window, while Kimi K2 0711 has a 131,000 token context window.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision. Kimi K2 0711 does not support vision.