Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Gemma 4 31B Instruct vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 31B InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 4 31B InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleNvidia
ReleasedApr 2026Oct 2025

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.7, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 10.5.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.