Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Gemma 4 31B Instruct vs Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Speed
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 31B InstructNemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 4 31B InstructNemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleNvidia
ReleasedApr 2026Unknown

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.7, compared to Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B's score of 31.2.