Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

MedGemma 27B vs GPT-5.1-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MedGemma 27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
MedGemma 27B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.1-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.1-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.1-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMedGemma 27BGPT-5.1-CodexWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.90$1.25 MedGemma 27B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.90$10.00 MedGemma 27B
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.45$0.13 GPT-5.1-Codex
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MedGemma 27B is 74% cheaper overall.

MedGemma 27B Providers

No provider data available

GPT-5.1-Codex Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
MedGemma 27B Wins
0
GPT-5.1-Codex Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMedGemma 27BGPT-5.1-CodexWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-43.1-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-36.6-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-95.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-86.0-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-86.0-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-84.9-
GPT-5.1-Codex significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MedGemma 27B
N/A
tokens
GPT-5.1-Codex
400,000
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricMedGemma 27BGPT-5.1-CodexWinner
Tokens/secondN/A121.1 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A5.52s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMedGemma 27BGPT-5.1-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMedGemma 27BGPT-5.1-Codex
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownNov 2025

MedGemma 27B Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.1-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MedGemma 27B with:

Compare GPT-5.1-Codex with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MedGemma 27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. MedGemma 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.6, compared to MedGemma 27B's score of N/A.
MedGemma 27B has a unknown token context window, while GPT-5.1-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
MedGemma 27B does not support vision. GPT-5.1-Codex supports vision.
Advertise with us