Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Z-ai

MedGemma 27B vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MedGemma 27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
MedGemma 27B
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Context Window
GLM-5 Turbo
Speed
GLM-5 Turbo

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMedGemma 27BGLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMedGemma 27BGLM-5 Turbo
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorGoogleZ-ai
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

MedGemma 27B Modalities

Input
Output

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MedGemma 27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. MedGemma 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
MedGemma 27B has a 8,192 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.