Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Inception
Inception
vs
Inception
Inception

Mercury 2 vs Mercury Coder

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Mercury 2 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Mercury Coder wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics
Price Advantage
Mercury 2
Benchmark Advantage
Mercury 2
Context Window
Mercury Coder
Speed
Mercury 2

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMercury 2Mercury Coder
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMercury 2Mercury Coder
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorInceptionInception
ReleasedMar 2026Apr 2025

Mercury 2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mercury Coder Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mercury 2 with:

Compare Mercury Coder with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mercury 2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. Mercury 2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
Mercury 2 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 30.6, compared to Mercury Coder's score of N/A.
Mercury 2 has a 128,000 token context window, while Mercury Coder has a 128,000 token context window.
Mercury 2 does not support vision. Mercury Coder does not support vision.