Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Kwaipilot
vs
Qwen
Qwen

KAT-Coder-Pro V1 vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

KAT-Coder-Pro V1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
KAT-Coder-Pro V1
Context Window
KAT-Coder-Pro V1
Speed
KAT-Coder-Pro V1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricKAT-Coder-Pro V1Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.21$0.15 Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.83$0.60 Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$41400.00$75000.00 KAT-Coder-Pro V1
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 28% cheaper overall.

KAT-Coder-Pro V1 Providers

AtlasCloud $0.21 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.21 (Cheapest)
StreamLake $0.21 (Cheapest)

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct Providers

Chutes $0.15 (Cheapest)
Nebius $0.25
Parasail $0.80
Novita $0.80
Together $1.20

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 Wins
0
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkKAT-Coder-Pro V1Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
36.1--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
18.3--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
94.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
81.3--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
76.4--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
74.7--
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
KAT-Coder-Pro V1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

KAT-Coder-Pro V1
256,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 has a 87% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricKAT-Coder-Pro V1Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructWinner
Tokens/second58.3 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token1.79sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKAT-Coder-Pro V1Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKAT-Coder-Pro V1Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorKwaipilotQwen
ReleasedNov 2025Feb 2025

KAT-Coder-Pro V1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare KAT-Coder-Pro V1 with:

Compare Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.60/M tokens.
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 18.3, compared to Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct's score of N/A.
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 has a 256,000 token context window, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 does not support vision. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports vision.