Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Kwaipilot
vs
Qwen
Qwen

KAT-Coder-Pro V1 vs QwQ 32B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

KAT-Coder-Pro V1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

QwQ 32B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
QwQ 32B
Benchmark Advantage
KAT-Coder-Pro V1
Context Window
KAT-Coder-Pro V1
Speed
KAT-Coder-Pro V1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricKAT-Coder-Pro V1QwQ 32BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.21$0.15 QwQ 32B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.83$0.40 QwQ 32B
Cache Read (per 1M)$41400.00N/A KAT-Coder-Pro V1
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, QwQ 32B is 41% cheaper overall.

KAT-Coder-Pro V1 Providers

AtlasCloud $0.21 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.21 (Cheapest)
StreamLake $0.21 (Cheapest)

QwQ 32B Providers

SiliconFlow $0.15 (Cheapest)
NextBit $0.15 (Cheapest)
Hyperbolic $0.25

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
5
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 Wins
0
QwQ 32B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkKAT-Coder-Pro V1QwQ 32BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
36.119.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
18.3--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
94.729.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
81.376.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
76.459.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
74.763.1
Aider
Real-world code editing
-26.2-
AIME
Competition math
-78.0-
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
KAT-Coder-Pro V1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

KAT-Coder-Pro V1
256,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
QwQ 32B
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 has a 87% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricKAT-Coder-Pro V1QwQ 32BWinner
Tokens/second58.3 tok/s28.9 tok/s
Time to First Token1.79s0.51s
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 responds 102% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKAT-Coder-Pro V1QwQ 32B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKAT-Coder-Pro V1QwQ 32B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorKwaipilotQwen
ReleasedNov 2025Mar 2025

KAT-Coder-Pro V1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

QwQ 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare KAT-Coder-Pro V1 with:

Compare QwQ 32B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

QwQ 32B has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. QwQ 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 18.3, compared to QwQ 32B's score of N/A.
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 has a 256,000 token context window, while QwQ 32B has a 32,768 token context window.
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 does not support vision. QwQ 32B does not support vision.