Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Liquid
Liquid
vs
Qwen
Qwen

LFM2-24B-A2B vs Qwen3.5 9B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

LFM2-24B-A2B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5 9B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
LFM2-24B-A2B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 9B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 9B
Speed
Qwen3.5 9B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLFM2-24B-A2BQwen3.5 9B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLFM2-24B-A2BQwen3.5 9B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorLiquidQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2026

LFM2-24B-A2B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 9B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

LFM2-24B-A2B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. LFM2-24B-A2B has cheaper output pricing at $0.12/M tokens.
LFM2-24B-A2B has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen3.5 9B has a 262,144 token context window.
LFM2-24B-A2B does not support vision. Qwen3.5 9B does not support vision.