Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Liquidai
Liquidai
vs
Minimax
Minimax

LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2BMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2BMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorLiquidaiMinimax
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B Modalities

Input
Output

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B has cheaper output pricing at $0.12/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B's score of 3.6.
LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B has a 32,768 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.