Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Liquidai
Liquidai
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B vs GPT-OSS-120b

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens

GPT-OSS-120b wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Context Window
GPT-OSS-120b
Speed
GPT-OSS-120b

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2BGPT-OSS-120b
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2BGPT-OSS-120b
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorLiquidaiOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownAug 2025

LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-OSS-120b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
GPT-OSS-120b scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.5, compared to LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B's score of 3.6.
LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B has a 32,768 token context window, while GPT-OSS-120b has a 131,072 token context window.
LiquidAI/LFM2-24B-A2B does not support vision. GPT-OSS-120b supports vision.