Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meituan
vs
Qwen
Qwen

LongCat Flash Chat vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

LongCat Flash Chat wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
LongCat Flash Chat
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLongCat Flash ChatQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLongCat Flash ChatQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMeituanQwen
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026

LongCat Flash Chat Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

LongCat Flash Chat has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. LongCat Flash Chat has cheaper output pricing at $0.80/M tokens.
LongCat Flash Chat has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
LongCat Flash Chat does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.