Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Code Llama 70B Python vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Code Llama 70B Python wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Code Llama 70B Python
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCode Llama 70B PythonLlama 3.1 405B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCode Llama 70B PythonLlama 3.1 405B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedUnknownJul 2024

Code Llama 70B Python Modalities

Input
Output

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Code Llama 70B Python has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Code Llama 70B Python has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Code Llama 70B Python has a 4,096 token context window, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has a 131,000 token context window.
Code Llama 70B Python does not support vision. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not support vision.