Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Code Llama 70B vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Code Llama 70B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Code Llama 70B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCode Llama 70BMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCode Llama 70BMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaMinimax
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Code Llama 70B Modalities

Input
Output

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Code Llama 70B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Code Llama 70B has a 4,096 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.