Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Context Window
Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 8B InstructQwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaQwen
ReleasedJul 2024Apr 2025

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a 16,384 token context window, while Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct does not support vision. Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct does not support vision.