Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.04 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.10 Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct is 11% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Providers

Cloudflare $0.05 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.05 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.06
Together $0.18

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Providers

Phala $0.04 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.04 (Cheapest)
Together $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
2
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Wins
1
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
10.935.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
4.3--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
1.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
46.436.5
GPQA
Graduate-level science
22.15.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
11.0--
AIME
Competition math
9.3--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-34.9-
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins 2 out of 8 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
131,072
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 75% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Tokens/second69.7 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.41sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaQwen
ReleasedSep 2024Oct 2024

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 4.3, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct supports vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.