Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaQwen
ReleasedSep 2024Oct 2024

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 4.3, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct supports vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.