Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructQwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructQwen3 Coder Next
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaQwen
ReleasedSep 2024Feb 2026

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.9, compared to Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct's score of 4.3.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct supports vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.